Committee Description

Topic A – Inequality of Opportunity

For years on end, inequality of opportunity has been a pressing issue characterized by financial barriers, nepotism, and limited inclusivity. The high costs associated with film production and promotion often restrict access to those with substantial financial resources, while nepotism enables individuals with established connections to secure opportunities more readily. Marginalized groups face additional challenges due to entrenched biases and a lack of representation, further compounding the difficulties for those outside the industry’s inner circles. Addressing these disparities requires systemic reforms to create a more equitable environment, ensuring that talent and creativity, rather than financial power or connections, determine success in the film industry. From nepotism to economic inclusivity, delegates will be debating and discussing a variety of cinematic challenges to mutually develop solutions. By stepping in the shoes of superstars, Will delegates be able to reform Hollywood or will inequality of opportunity take a turn of its own?

Topic B – Influential Power and the Role of Celebrities

In this committee, the topic of “Influential Power and the Role of Celebrities” explores how public figures leverage their fame and platform to impact societal issues, both positively and negatively. Celebrities often possess substantial influence due to their extensive reach and visibility, which can be harnessed to drive awareness and change on critical matters like social justice, environmental sustainability, or public health. However, this power can also be wielded irresponsibly, potentially spreading misinformation, reinforcing harmful stereotypes, or prioritizing personal agendas over the greater good. This committee centers on how to maximize the beneficial effects of celebrity influence while mitigating the risks of its misuse, aiming to balance individual impact with collective responsibility. Delegates will be encouraged to address the multifaceted consequences by analyzing and responding to “influential power.” Will delegates be able to develop cinematic policies to challenge disparities or will popularity become ones’ best friend?

Dais